[SR-Dev] msilo comparison

[Jan Janak]

On 11-05 12:31, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> i recently added a new feature to k msilo module and now took a look how
> does s msilo compare to k's.  it turns out that k msilo module has lots
> of stuff that is missing from s version.
> 
> there seems to be one difference though.  in s module there is this:
> 
> registrar (string)
> 
>    The SIP address used to inform users that destination of their message
>    is not online and the message will be delivered next time when that
>    user goes online. If the parameter is not set, the module will not
>    send any notification. All requests intended for this SIP address will
>    not be stored for lately delivery.
> 
>    Default value is "NULL".
> 
>    Example 5. Set the registrar parameter
> ...
> modparam("msilo", "registrar", "sip:registrar at iptel.org")
> 
> and the corresponding thing in k is this:
> 
> 1.3.3. from_address (string)
> 
>    The SIP address used to inform users that destination of their
>    message is not online and the message will be delivered next
>    time when that user goes online. If the parameter is not set,
>    the module will not send any notification. It can contain
>    pseudo-variables.
> 
>    Default value is "NULL".
> 
>    Example 1.3. Set the "from_address" parameter
> ...
> modparam("msilo", "from_address", "sip:registrar at example.org")
> modparam("msilo", "from_address", "sip:$rU at example.org")
> 
> in my opnion the difference is so small that we could adopt k version of
> msilo as is.
> 
> comments?

There is more, the ser version of the module has a different database table,
we use uids to identify owners of stored messages. This is something we use
and need to preserve.

  Jan.