[sr-dev] Dispatcher "maxload" attribute

[Ovidiu Sas]

I didn't check the code. I see it in trunk now, all good.
We can say that my initial statement is true for the stable version of
kamailio ;)

-ovidiu


On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Federico Cabiddu
<federico.cabiddu at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is, unless there is a bug ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Federico
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that was added recently.  It could/should be listed under the
>> RPC attrs node.
>> It's a quick way to verify that the special attrs are properly defined
>> by admin and recognised by kamailio.
>>
>> -ovidiu
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Federico Cabiddu
>> <federico.cabiddu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > There is a fourth one, 'socket', to set the socket used to send pings
>> > and
>> > requests.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Federico
>> >
>> > On 11 Dec 2014 17:46, "Ovidiu Sas" <osas at voipembedded.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> BTW, all 'special' attributes are listed in the RPC 'dispatcher.list'
>> >> command.
>> >> So far, there are three reserved attributes:
>> >>  - duid
>> >>  - maxload
>> >>  - weight
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On 11 Dec 2014, at 16:15, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> >> > <miconda at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hello,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> it is supposed to be the upper limit for call load distribution --
>> >> >> if
>> >> >> number of active calls gets to it, no new call should be sent there.
>> >> >> If
>> >> >> not implemented, then I forgot about it.
>> >> > I think there's a risc that your latest statement is true. If so,
>> >> > this
>> >> > is a gentle
>> >> > reminder ;-)
>> >> >
>> >> > /O
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Daniel
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 11/12/14 15:41, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> >> >>> Hi!
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> In the source code for dispatcher there is parsing of a predefined
>> >> >>> attribute called "maxload".
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> It's not documented and I don't see it used anywhere in the source
>> >> >>> code. Only in output of
>> >> >>> attributes and debug code.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Anyone that knows more? Can we remove this unused attribute or is
>> >> >>> it
>> >> >>> planned for future glory?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> /O
>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> sr-dev mailing list
>> >> >>> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> >> >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> >> >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> sr-dev mailing list
>> >> >> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> >> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > sr-dev mailing list
>> >> > sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> >> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> VoIP Embedded, Inc.
>> >> http://www.voipembedded.com
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> sr-dev mailing list
>> >> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sr-dev mailing list
>> > sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> VoIP Embedded, Inc.
>> http://www.voipembedded.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sr-dev mailing list
>> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>



-- 
VoIP Embedded, Inc.
http://www.voipembedded.com