[sr-dev] [kamailio/kamailio] tm: reset T_ASYNC_CONTINUE flag in t_suspend (#955)

[Federico Cabiddu]

Thanks, should I backport it too?

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
notifications at github.com> wrote:

> It's a bit foggy the purpose right now, or better said the duration when
> that flag is needed. I didn't have the time to dig into it too much and
> don't remember the full purpose for it right now. I expected to be related
> to the fact of choosing the final response while a suspended branch is
> still processed.
>
> But I think your patch is better in this regard, because it preserves the
> old behaviour (which didn't have a complaint on this flag) longer, until a
> new suspend is done. So can be merged as it is.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276086137>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADip44rHstoc23NanawiPEhAdBUkWDJwks5rXfx4gaJpZM4LwvBV>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276087863
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/attachments/20170130/779203c6/attachment-0001.html>