Hi,<br><br>Just to add some more info that could help:<br><br>- The same problem happened again and I've been able to print the buffer with the message that has caused the deadlock:<br><br>0x8158040 <buf.4000>: "INVITE <a href="mailto:sip%3Ayyyyyy@xxxxxxxxx.com">sip:yyyyyy@xxxxxxxxx.com</a> SIP/2.0\r\nRecord-Route: <sip:10.172.0.252;lr=on;ftag=as2b58915e>\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.172.0.252;branch=z9hG4bKa81d.d5c45ce4.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.172.0.253:5060;branch=z"...<br>
0x8158108 <buf.4000+200>: "9hG4bK3fd5e08b;rport=5060\r\nFrom: \"SSSSSS Ssssss\" <<a href="mailto:sip%3Azzzzz@xxxxxxxxx.com">sip:zzzzz@xxxxxxxxx.com</a>>;tag=as2b58915e\r\nTo: <<a href="mailto:sip%3Ayyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx.com">sip:yyyyy@xxxxxxxxxx.com</a>>\r\nContact: <<a href="mailto:sip%3Azzzzz@10.172.0.253">sip:zzzzz@10.172.0.253</a>>\r\nCall-ID: 50bec1d32a47ca2b3a71253357c4f11e@x"...<br>
0x81581d0 <buf.4000+400>: "<a href="http://xxxxxxxx.com">xxxxxxxx.com</a>\r\nCSeq: 102 INVITE\r\nUser-Agent: Vvvvvvvvvvvvv\r\nMax-Forwards: 68\r\nDate: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:20:08 GMT\r\nAllow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY\r\nSupported: replace"...<br>
0x8158298 <buf.4000+600>: "s\r\nOrigin: from-phone\r\nContent-Type: application/sdp\r\nContent-Length: 263\r\n\r\nv=0\r\no=root 28715 28715 IN IP4 10.172.0.253\r\ns=session\r\nc=IN IP4 10.172.0.253\r\nt=0 0\r\nm=audio 15034 RTP/AVP 18 101\r\na=rtpma"...<br>
0x8158360 <buf.4000+800>: "p:18 G729/8000\r\na=fmtp:18 annexb=no\r\na=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000\r\na=fmtp:101 0-16\r\na=silenceSupp:off - - - -\r\na=ptime:20\r\na=sendrecv\r\n"<br><br>- By checking the backtraces I've seen that the pua_dialoginfo module could be involved and in this server we applied the patches from: <a href="http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=18">http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=18</a> and <a href="http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=20">http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=20</a>. I think these were ported to 3.0.0 but not to 1.5. Could they be causing the problem?<br>
<br>Thank you in advance.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Santi<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/5/20 marius zbihlei <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marius.zbihlei@1and1.ro">marius.zbihlei@1and1.ro</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Forwarded the message from sr-users to sr-dev list<br>
<br>
Cheers<br><font color="#888888">
Marius<br>
</font><br>Santiago Gimeno wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<br>
The problem happened again and I can provide some more info.<br>
6 of the UDP worker processes got blocked. By checking the logs I can see that 4 of them, that seem to be related to the same INVITE request, got blocked at the same time. The other 2 got blocked some hours later and not at the same time.<br>
<br>