<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/4.0.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Actually, the example from section C.1.1 of OMA-TS-Presence-SIMPLE_Content_XDM-V1_0-20081223-C is: <BR>
/org.openmobilealliance.pres-content/users/<A HREF="sip:hermione.blosom@example.com">sip:hermione.blosom@example.com</A>/oma_status-icon/icon_document<BR>
<BR>
The client I have been testing with just happens to use the file name "preseImage" instead of "icon_document". I think the important part in the specification is the path "/org.openmobilealliance.pres-content/users/<A HREF="sip:hermione.blosom@example.com">sip:hermione.blosom@example.com</A>/oma_status-icon/" and the file name of the document is somewhat optional.<BR>
<BR>
Peter<BR>
<BR>
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:52 +0300, Juha Heinanen wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
Juha Heinanen writes:
> ok. i'll try to check it too. i wonder where xcap-icon cli tool and
> jitsi got oma_status-icon, since it does not conform to the usual oma
> naming style.
after googling around, i got to conclusion that status icon url looks like
this:
/<xcap-root>/org.openmobilealliance.pres-content/users/sip:<user>@<domain>/oma_status-icon/rcs_status_icon
in peter's config, preseImage was used instead of rcs_status_icon:
$var(doc_uri) =
$(hu{re.subst,/(^\/xcap-root\/)oma_status-icon(\/users\/.*\/).*$/\1org.openmobilealliance.pres-content\2oma_status-icon\/preseImage/});
peter, why the difference?
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org">sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org</A>
<A HREF="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev</A>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<PRE>
--
Peter Dunkley
Technical Director
Crocodile RCS Ltd
</PRE>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>