Hey Kamal,<div><br></div><div>The idea behind the new design is that there will not be 1 module for PCSCF, 1 for SCSF, 1 for ICSCF, etc. Instead the individual logical components that make up functionality of a PCSCF is released as a module. So effectively, you can build a P/S/I CSCF based purely on config file and the appropriate functions/modules you require. For example, if you want a PCSCF to do PCC, you will load the diameter_rx module and call Rx_AAR before you setup a call (on_reply route block getting RTP). The diameter_rx module we have released will apply for QoS from PCRF and monitor the dialog (using dialog2) and tear it down should QoS disappear, etc, etc.</div>
<div><br></div><div>This will allow us to re-use functionality where necessary across the modules, as opposed to the way it is now where functionality is replicated in all 3 modules. It also makes it a heck of a lot easier to manage the bite-size chunks of functionality in their individual modules.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Hope that makes sense.</div><div><br></div><div>p.s. this will most likely be quite a long task and we are def. still in alpha stage so don't expect thing to be rock solid just yet. maybe another few iterations on the code released so far, but with help from you and others we could progress quite quickly</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div>Jason</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:59 AM, kamal koubaa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kamal.koubaa@gmail.com">kamal.koubaa@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hi,<br>
Great !!!, I'll wait for that, is the built P-CSCF will be of the new<br>
design or the old one, because I see no pcscf module in your branch?<br>
<br>
Thanks a lot,<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Kamal<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Jason Penton <<a href="mailto:jason.penton@gmail.com">jason.penton@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Kamal,<br>
> Yes it should work. I am just busy with something else at the moment, but I<br>
> will attach a pcscf example cfg file before the end of the day (GMT+2) ;)<br>
> It will be great to get your feedback on your testing! ;)<br>
> Cheers<br>
> Jason<br>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, kamal koubaa <<a href="mailto:kamal.koubaa@gmail.com">kamal.koubaa@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Jason,<br>
>><br>
>> Is it possible at this point to build a working P-CSCF using the<br>
>> source on your branche ?.<br>
>> If so you have a working config file for that, I would like to use it<br>
>> to access an I/S-CSCF in an existing IMS core. If the actual code<br>
>> could do that, it would help a lot.<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> Kamal<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> sr-dev mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org">sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> sr-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org">sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev</a><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
sr-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org">sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>