<div dir="ltr"><div>Charles,</div><div><br></div><div>The parameter does make an important difference. Instead of using host names it uses explicit IP addresses which are saved in the DMQ structure.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm in the midst of several things right now so it will be faster if you can push. Next time, if it should happen, I will work with a pull request. Sorry for the extra work.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Bob</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Charles Chance <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:charles.chance@sipcentric.com" target="_blank">charles.chance@sipcentric.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Bob,<div><br></div><div>Sorry for the delay.</div><div><br></div><div>It all seems fine - the patch did not apply against the master branch, so I added it manually. I'm not sure we need the extra module parameter though, since it doesn't break existing functionality if only a single DNS record is present or an IP address is specified directly. Did you have a reason for adding the parameter?</div><div><br></div><div>I can either push directly to master, or if you'd prefer you can create a pull request (again, master, not 4.2).</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Charles</div><div><br></div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 March 2015 at 15:59, Charles Chance <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:charles.chance@sipcentric.com" target="_blank">charles.chance@sipcentric.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div dir="ltr">Hi Bob,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for your patch. At quick glance it looks great but I will take a closer look over the next 24 hours and report back.</div><div><br></div><div>It is in my opinion a worthwhile addition and your time is very much appreciated.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Charles</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On 20 March 2015 at 20:46, Robert Boisvert <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rdboisvert@gmail.com" target="_blank">rdboisvert@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid"><div><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Charles,</div><div><br></div><div>I coded and tested the attached patch based on 4.2.3 code. So as not to disturb current functionality, I add a modparam called "<font face="monospace,monospace">multi_notify</font>". When set to a non-zero value it loads all IPs returned by the SIP URI, including those provided by DNS SRV records.</div><div><br></div><div>With regard to your point about the notifications being sent to all nodes in the cluster, I noticed that if hosts A, B and C send notifications to D and D is not available when the cluster starts DMQ will not function even if D comes up some time later. However, if I create a SRV record or A records that resolve to hosts D and E and send notifications to that group with <font face="monospace,monospace">multi_notify</font> set to 1 then the cluster will always function as long as one either D or E is functional. Even in a well-designed network servers may be unavailable for a period of time so this redundancy allows functionality to be preserved during downtime.</div><div><br></div><div>We are having good success with this current patch and would like to request that it be mainstreamed.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for considering this request and for your help,</div><div>Bob<br></div></div>
<br></div></div><span>_______________________________________________<br>
sr-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org" target="_blank">sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev</a><br>
<br></span></blockquote></div><span><font color="#888888"><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><div dir="ltr"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b><font>Charles Chance</font></b><br><font>Managing Director</font></font><br><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font><br></font></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font>t. 0121 285 4400 m. 07932 063 891</font></font></div></div></div>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><div dir="ltr"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><b><font>Charles Chance</font></b><br><font>Managing Director</font></font><br><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font><br></font></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><font>t. 0121 285 4400 m. 07932 063 891</font></font></div></div></div>
</div>
<br>
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><font><span style="font-size:10pt"><a title="blocked::http://www.sipcentric.com/" href="http://www.sipcentric.com/" target="_blank">www.sipcentric.com</a><br>
<br>
Follow us on twitter <a title="blocked::http://twitter.com/sipcentric" href="http://twitter.com/sipcentric" target="_blank">@sipcentric</a><br>
<br>
<font color="gray">Sipcentric Ltd.
Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592.</font> <font color="gray">Registered
office: Faraday Wharf, Innovation Birmingham Campus, Holt Street, Birmingham Science Park, Birmingham B7 4BB.</font></span></font></font></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
sr-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org">sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>