[Serusers] Grandstream Phones

Jan Janak jan at iptel.org
Tue Sep 2 21:20:45 CEST 2003


Out of curiosity, how about version for Linux ?

  Jan.

On 02-09 12:18, Erik Lagerway wrote:
> Gavin,
> 
> REFER is coming shortly [within 3 weeks] along with many more features. When
> we are finished with REFER we would be happy to do some interop testing with
> Grandstream.
> 
> Cheers,
> Erik
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org]On
> Behalf Of Gavin Bensom
>   Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 1:02 AM
>   To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>   Subject: Re: [Serusers] Grandstream Phones
> 
> 
>   Hello All,
> 
>   It is actually X-ten's X-Pro UA which is causing the call transfer
> problem. From looking at the message headers in the data packets I can see
> the following line originating from X-Pro.
> 
>   Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS
> 
>   The Grandstream UA headers have the following:
> 
>   Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE
> 
>   I don't know why X-Pro is so limited. I had X-Lite [the limited version]
> installed on the same PC. X-Pro is supposed to enable all supported
> features. Anyone at X-ten care to comment?
>   I uninstalled both X-Lite and X-Pro and the reinstalled only X-Pro and
> still get the same behavior.
> 
>   Awhile back someone asked for a link or copy of Iptel's ser.cfg file. Is
> that available for viewing? Can the link be posted again [assuming it was
> before]?
> 
>   Thanks,
>   G.
> 
>   Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org> wrote:
>     At 10:37 PM 8/29/2003, Gavin Bensom wrote:
>     >Hello,
>     >
>     >Has anyone used the Grandstream BudgeTone-100 phones with SER? When I
> try to transfer a call the call gets disconnected.
> 
>     Yes, but I haven't tried the transfer feature. Note that it is
> reponsibility
>     of end-device to implement call transfer correctly. SER just processes
> call
>     transfer as any other SIP transaction.If you find any explanations about
> the
>     roots of the problem, please share it with us over the mailing list.
> 
> 
>     >
>     >The grandstream documentation shows the transfer protocol here:
>     >http://www.grandstream.com/user_manuals/budgetone100.pdf [pg 15,16 of
> the .pdf]
>     >Any ideas what is happening? Is the Grandstream protocol compliant with
> what SER expects for transferring calls?
>     >
>     >Also, does S ER support the 484 Incomplete address response?
> 
>     SER supports any responses, including "100 thanks for calling", "101 we
> are trying
>     for you", "102 have a nice day, I'm connecting your call", etc -- it is
> a configuration
>     option what you send back. You just need to design a proper numbering
> plan and
>     return 484 if GS's INVITEs include incomplete numbers.
> 
> 
>     >The BudgeTone phone can be set to send an INVITE after every button
> press, and will continue to do so if the server response with incomplete
> address instead of 404 not found.
>     >
>     >Finally, if users passwords are set to (null) will a phone that
> registers with a username but no password successfully register? [I haven't
> tried it yet].
> 
>     No -- that would allow anybody who supplies empty password successfuly
>     steal my incoming calls.
> 
>     -jiri
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>   Do you Yahoo!?
>   The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers




More information about the sr-users mailing list