[Sip-implementors] Re: [Serusers] FW: Forking Proxy

[Paul Kyzivat]

I agree. Note that it is also possible that the 200 which arrives has a 
to-tag different from any of those received in 1xx responses. In that 
case it would establish a new dialog, and the ACK would be sent over that.

	Paul

Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Yes, that's a good description.
> 
> klaus
> 
> Juha Heinanen wrote:
> 
>> i kept on reading rfc3261 and came to the following conclusion:
>>
>> each 1xx response to the invite creates its own dialog at the uac.  when
>> the uac receives 200 ok, the dialog with matching dialog id is
>> transitioned from early to confirmed state.  the other dialogs still
>> remain in early state until 64*T1 seconds has passed, at which point
>> they are terminated.  the ack is sent to the 200 ok and always has to
>> tag that matches the one in the 200 ok (in jason's example 5678).
>>
>> -- juha
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>