[Serusers] mediaproxy + ser0.8.14 problem

[Adrian Georgescu]

Your config calls fix_contact twice, this is why is crashing. Until  
this is  fixed  please follow the guidelines in ser.cfg example from

http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ser/sip_router/ 
modules/mediaproxy/config/ser.cfg?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain

Adrian

 >>>

here is my config any help at all work be great



route{

         # initial sanity checks -- messages with
         # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
         if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
                 sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
                 break;
         };
         if (msg:len >=  max_len ) {
                 sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
                 break;
         };




         if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:"))
         {
            if (is_from_local())
            {
               log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP,
rewriting\n");
               if (client_nat_test("3"))
               {
                  setflag(2);
                  force_rport();
                  fix_contact();
               };

            };
         };



         if (method == "REGISTER")
         {
           save("location");
           break;
         };


         #if (method == "INVITE")
         #{
         #   if("!(is_from_local() || is_uri_host_local()))
         #   {
         #      sl_send_reply("403", "Relaying is forbidden");
         #      break;
         #   };
         #   t_on_failure("1");
         #}
         #else if (method == "BYE" || method == "CANCEL")
         #{
         #   end_media_session();
         #};





         if (loose_route())
         {
            if (method == "INVITE" || method == "ACK")
            {
               use_media_proxy();
            };

            t_relay();
            break;
         };



         # Force subsequent messages to pass through this proxy
         if (method == "INVITE")
         {
            record_route();
         };

         if (client_nat_test("3") && !search("^Record-Route:"))
         {
            # Mark as NAT'ED
            force_rport();
            fix_contact();
         };


         if (method == "INVITE")
         {
            t_on_reply("1");
         };



         #if (is_uri_host_local())
         #{
         #   if(!lookup("location"))
         #   {
         #      sl_send_reply("404", "User not found");
         #      break;
         #   };
         #};


         if (method == "INVITE" || method == "ACK")
         {
            use_media_proxy();
         };

         if (uri=~"^sip:7[0-9]{3}@.*")
         {
            if (is_user_in("from", "pbx"))
            {
               # if (isflagset(6))
               #{
                  rewritehostport("*.*.*.*");
                  forward(uri:host, uri:port);
                  xlog("L_ERR", "LOG - method<%rm> uri<%ru> from<%fu>
to<%tu>\n");
                  log (1,"PSTN Call\n");
                  setflag(2);
                  break;
               #};
            };
         };


         if (!t_relay())
         {
            if (method == "INVITE" || method == "ACK")
            {
               end_media_session();
            };
            sl_reply_error();
         };
}


failure_route[1]
{
    end_media_session();
}

onreply_route[1]
{
    if (status=~"(183)|(2[0-9][0-9])")
    {
       if (client_nat_test("1"))
       {
          fix_contact();
       };
       use_media_proxy();
    };
}

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Adrian Georgescu [SMTP:ag at ag-projects.com]
> Sent:	06 August 2004 12:11
> To:	Sean Lowry
> Cc:	serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject:	Re: [Serusers] mediaproxy + ser0.8.14 problem
>
> That sample configuration is OK. Your problem must be searched
> elsewhere.
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2004, at 12:51 PM, Sean Lowry wrote:
>
>> Umm very strange i used the example.cfg and inside there it has the
>> fix_contact in the registration, and in the client_nat_test and also
>> in te
>> onreply_route.
>>
>>
>> so what is the correct format if this is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From:	Adrian Georgescu [SMTP:ag at ag-projects.com]
>>> Sent:	06 August 2004 11:55
>>> To:	dave at fuuz.com
>>> Cc:	serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> Subject:	[Serusers] mediaproxy + ser0.8.14 problem
>>>
>>> See http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-August/010420.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Have been trying to get media proxy to work with 0.8.14 and am not
>>> having a huge amount of joy.  Basically the route processing seems to
>>> be
>>> fine, but as soon as ser attempts to actually pass traffic through
>>> media
>>> proxy it crashes out!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Request from RFC Private IP
>>> Detected --> mediaproxy flagged
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: VOICEMAIL: VM user detected -->
>>> activating VM Flag
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Caller is NAT'd  
>>> (destination
>>> offline) --> enable reply processing
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3066]: NAT: Invite received -->  
>>> enabling
>>> media proxy
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: child process 3066 exited by a
>>> signal 11
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: core was not generated
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3052]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3186]: INFO: signal 15 received
>>>
>>> Aug  5 15:30:13 sip /sbin/ser[3193]: INFO: signal 15 received
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (the same is true if the destination is online as well).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I may have a problem with symmetric/asymmetric clients, but I don't
>>> think ser should actually crash like that... does anyone have any
>>> ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave  << File: ATT13254.txt >>