[Serusers] rtpproxy/nathelper configuration issues. i think.
Eric C. Snowdeal III
eric at snowdeal.org
Mon Feb 2 05:46:29 CET 2004
Andres wrote:
> Eric C. Snowdeal III wrote:
>>
>> if (method=="INVITE") {
>> record_route();
>>
>
>
> There is no way this config can pass thru here since the flag is never
> set. If you are not interested in discriminating then remove the
> isflagset check and just do force_rtp_proxy for every INVITE:
>
>> if (isflagset(1)) { # ATA ?
>> force_rtp_proxy();
>> };
>> /* set up reply processing */
>> t_on_reply("1");
>> };
>>
o.k. that was stupid. let me try again. i've changed the config as
follows:
if (method=="INVITE") {
record_route();
setflag(1);
force_rtp_proxy();
/* set up reply processing */
t_on_reply("1");
};
and it works! i'll work in discriminating UAs down the road. i
sincerely appreciate you humoring my newbieness, i obviously have more
to learn about the ways of the config file.
More information about the sr-users
mailing list