[Serusers] SER + Proxy + NAT

[Atle Samuelsen]

Is it possible to get a copy of your version ? I would gladly help out
testing it.

- Atle


* Maxim Sobolev <sobomax at portaone.com> [040129 18:26]:
> I am testing a new version of rtp proxy now, which would allow it to be 
> used as a rtp bridge between local network and public one. I plan to 
> release it somewhere at the next week, so that  stay tuned.
> 
> -Maxim
> 
> Edson Gellert Schubert wrote:
> 
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Hi all...
> >
> >I look through the list's archives, but an not finding info to help me.
> >
> >The goal is use SER but not instaled in the GW/FW (it's not an acceptable
> >option, well it's acceptable, but not for now). So I'm trying to put the 
> >SER
> >in the Internal LAN (it could be installed in a DMZ also). So the question
> >is if there is any proxy that could be putted on the GW/FW to handle
> >incomming calls (INVITEs) and forward it correctly to the SER machine taken
> >over the NAT issues?
> >
> >I already look at SIProxd and RTProxy, but the first didn't forward
> >incomming calls, and the second demands that it be instaled, with SER on 
> >the
> >GW/FW. I also am looking at SERMediaProxy (RTProxy alternative) but the
> >documentations aren't sufficient detailed to answer my question. Any help
> >would be appreciated.
> >
> >Edson.
> >
> >#=============================
> >f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng.
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: PGP 8.0
> >
> >iQA/AwUBQBhxkDdMQB7Du1dpEQLaBwCgi6SrH3d6UtOdAnHDu+Tyfydn1BQAn0Md
> >VEsHHSQR/bgoF/eAi2yh2yW9
> >=Y13k
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>