[Serusers] FQDN in Via and Record Route header

[Chuck Ramirez]

Hello Andrei,

What do you mean by 'is generally a bad ideea', the
only point I see is the SRV problem in the FQDN. What
else makes you think it is a bad idea?

Thanks a lot,

Chuck.

--- Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
<pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2004 at 13:26, zeusng
> <zeus.ng at isquare.com.au> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is it possible to have FQDN in the Via and
> Record-route header instead of IP
> > address in SER? 
> 
> This is generally a bad ideea, but if you really
> want to, there is a
> way: set advertised_address="myname.com" in your
> config and all your
> messages will have "myname.com" in their Via (this
> can be any string, no
> check will be made). If you want to do it only on a
> per message basis
> (and not for all messages), use
> set_advertised_address("...").
> Notice however that in this case any compliant sip
> proxy will add a
> received=ip to your via, and they will use that ip
> when sending the
> replies back (and not your fqdn).
> 
> More info in sip_router/NEWS, grep after
> "advertised".
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com