[Serusers] rtpproxy locks up ser
'Jan Janak'
jan at iptel.org
Sat Apr 9 10:38:47 CEST 2005
connected mode.
Jan.
On 06-04 22:34, Richard wrote:
> Thanks Jan. It is really good to know.
>
> I tried udp, got quite a few udp connections even for a very low volume test
> system, a netstat -na shows,
>
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5059 0.0.0.0:*
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33098 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33099 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33100 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33101 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33102 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33103 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
> udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33104 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
> udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35032 0.0.0.0:*
> udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35033 0.0.0.0:*
> udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35034 0.0.0.0:*
> udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35035 0.0.0.0:*
>
> You can see only one rtpproxy session here. But there are a bunch of
> connections for port 5059 which rtpproxy listens to.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan at iptel.org]
> > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 2:29 AM
> > To: Richard
> > Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] rtpproxy locks up ser
> >
> > Try to use UDP instead of unix domain sockets for the communication
> > between ser and rtpproxy. The the rtpproxy blocks for some reason, UDP
> > packets would be simply dropped and SER would continue to process
> > another SIP request.
> >
> > Jan.
> >
> > On 30-03 10:22, Richard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I don't know if anyone has experienced this. The ser stops getting any
> > > packets, ser log shows no activity. When I do "netstat -an", I got this,
> > >
> > > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
> > State
> > > udp 261580 0 80.1.2.3:5060 0.0.0.0:*
> > > udp 85224 0 0.0.0.0:35940 0.0.0.0:*
> > > udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:35941 0.0.0.0:*
> > > udp 47704 0 0.0.0.0:35942 0.0.0.0:*
> > > udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:35943 0.0.0.0:*
> > >
> > > I restarted ser several times, didn't help. So I restarted rtpproxy. Ser
> > > started processing packets and the recv-q drops to 0. I wonder what
> > could
> > > cause recv-Q accumulating packets. Everything was running fine without
> > any
> > > problem for a long time. I haven't made any change to either ser or
> > rtpproxy
> > > recently.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list