[Serusers] failure_route vs. onreply

Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
Wed Apr 20 19:07:08 CEST 2005


At 02:31 PM 4/20/2005, Matt Schulte wrote:
>Ok, are these the same thing? 

no

failure_route reprocesses requests which failed. onreply processes
replies coming back.

-jiri

>I remember reading that onreply was
>renamed to failure due to confusion? Now I'm confused again ;-) 
>
>        Matt
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 




More information about the sr-users mailing list