[Serusers] Hairpin solutions?

[Klaus Darilion]

Carlo wrote:
> maybe you are right but I can see that FWD is using Jasomi SBC to solve 
> nat problems.

There are also other SIP provider than FWD ;-)

klaus

> 
>  http://lite.fwdnet.net/index.php?section_id=78
> 
> Carlo
> 
> Jiri Kuthan ha scritto:
> 
>>beg my pardon, but I don't really think that one needs a session border control, particularly 
>>becasue of the reasons related to bad scalability, bandwidth waste and latency. Sinle point
>>of failure is another concern.
>>
>>-jiri
>>
>>At 02:20 PM 8/26/2005, Carlo wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>What you need is a session border control.
>>>Try this link from Jasomi : http://www.jasomi.com/ppfes.html
>>>or this from Kagoor ( now Juniper ) http://www.juniper.net/customers/support/products/vf1000.jsp
>>>
>>>
>>>Federico Giannici ha scritto:
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>>Considering that we DON'T want to use an RTP Proxy (bad scalability, waste of bandwidth and longer delays), is there any solution to the "hairpin" problems?
>>>>
>>>>Are there any "boxes" that look at the SIP messages and short-circuit calls from and to the local network?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks.
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 
>>
>>
>>
>>  
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers