[Serusers] callpickup with ser + asterisk

[Iqbal]

ignore this, I just moved my alias lookup, and checked for RURI instead :-)

Iqbal

Iqbal wrote:

> Hi
>
> Will do, my intial problem was that the pickup sequence i.e *8 is 
> processed in sip.conf, however when I was sending calls to asterisk I 
> prefixed the number with 98, reason for that was so I could send /use 
> diff applications based upon settings in my group table. Anyhow 
> resolved that, simply changed the features.conf to recongise 98*8 :-)
>
> Then the problem was that when a user dialed out from IP the call was 
> routed via asterisk, however when the call was inbound eg +44845634522 
> which is mapped to 040600, then the call didn't hit asterisk which 
> meant the features like call pickup could not get activated. This 
> meant adding the +44 number to the grp table also, because in theory 
> 040600 and +44845634522 are just aliases for the same number, but the 
> is_user_in doesn't check that, it just sees what entries are in grp 
> table, I guess what would be nice is if we could use is_user_in 
> ("From" ,"xgroup")  it would do a lookup first to get the number from 
> the From eg 040600, and then see what aliases it has, and see if any 
> of them match.
>
> eg 44845634522 has alias 634522
>
> in grp I could enter just
> 634522,dom.com,asterisk
>
> then when a call came in and it was from PSTn to 44845634522 I could 
> just use is_user_in(To,"asterisk") and it would see that 44845634522 
> is and alias for 634522 and hence run is_user_in(To,"asterisk") again 
> with the new alias, and keep doing until it matches or until it runs 
> out of aliases.
>
> Iqbal
>
> Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>
>> Take a look at the * users list. There was a post today or yesterday 
>> which provided a patch for getting pickup running with snom phones. 
>> Dont know if it works or even with other phones...
>>
>>  Nils
>>
>> On Monday 18 July 2005 19:45, Iqbal wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> Has anyone successfully got this to work, or is anyone working on this,
>>> asterisk on its own seems to be a no brainer, but with the phones in
>>> registered in ser, and the calls be routed...well thats a different 
>>> story.
>>>
>>> Iqbal
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>   
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> .
>