[Serusers] multiple contact entries automatically....

Iqbal iqbal at gigo.co.uk
Wed Jun 29 22:55:54 CEST 2005


client = grandstream 102
router = safecom
stun = no, all far end done at ser

am gonna try to upgrade the firmware and see if that helps

Iqbal

On 6/29/2005, "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:

>You have sent the 200 ok - not the REGISTER message. I still think that
>there will be only 1 Contact in each REGISTER.
>
>Probably the client or/and the NAT is broken:
>
>Which client do you use?
>Which NAT do you use?
>Do you use STUN?
>
>klaus
>
>Iqbal wrote:
>> yup, thats what made me jump,
>>
>> well hers ngrep of when i get a 200OK
>>
>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 111.222.333.444:51687;branch=z9hG4bK35d8fac5c0e457cb;rport=50395.
>> From: <sip:040686 at sip.domain.com>;tag=107864afa36620af.
>> To: <sip:040686 at sip.domain.com>;tag=bde2d0f39a3c31098b0c0a337d26256c.e50e.
>> Call-ID: 55e8c488a0336b09 at 10.0.0.14.
>> CSeq: 101 REGISTER.
>> Contact:
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:51687>;expires=3600;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:48934>;expires=2998;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:34201>;expires=2680;received="sip:111.222.333.444:50395",
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:63368>;expires=2352;received="sip:111.222.333.444:55174",
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:47768>;expires=2164;received="sip:111.222.333.444:37787",
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:33650>;expires=1360;received="sip:111.222.333.444:40862",
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:46754>;expires=121;received="sip:111.222.333.444:33159",
>> <sip:040686 at 111.222.333.444:33159>;expires=26;received="sip:111.222.333.444:62574".
>>
>> Content-Length: 0.
>> Warning: 392 123.456.76.87:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:  pid=32086
>> req_src_ip=111.222.333.444 req_src_port=50395 in_uri=sip:sip.domain.com
>> out_uri=sip:sip.domain.com via_cnt==1".
>>
>> which is what cause me to use serctl to look at location, and I got
>> multiple entries.
>>
>> Havent a clue why this is/was
>>
>> iqbal
>>
>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>>> Are you sure that they really get created at once? Is there more than
>>> 1 Contact in the REGISTER message?
>>>
>>> Please post an ngrep dump.
>>>
>>> klaus
>>>
>>> Iqbal wrote:
>>>
>>>> the expire times do vary, the thing is they get all created on
>>>> register at the same time, so I have 4 contacts for a new registers.
>>>>
>>>> Iqbal
>>>>
>>>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> MAybe the NAT binding disappears and a new port will bu used by the
>>>>> NAT device. If you use nathelper, then you will save teh port of the
>>>>> new binding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do the contacts vary in their expire time?
>>>>>  Yes: NAT problem
>>>>>  No: ? client problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> klaus
>>>>>
>>>>> Iqbal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a really strange problem, when I am registering a IP phone,
>>>>>> which is connected to a simple 4 port router, it i submitting
>>>>>> multiple contacts into the db.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even in the sip messages I can see multiple entries, the IP:port
>>>>>> pairs only differ in the port numbers. Anyone else had this problem,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Iqbal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>




More information about the sr-users mailing list