[Serusers] Accounting Failed INVITE Messages
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Fri Mar 4 17:52:33 CET 2005
AFAIK that should do. Does accouting of succesful transactions work?
btw: why 503? wouldn't 403 more appropriate?
regards,
klaus
Java Rockx wrote:
> Klaus,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I do have failed_transactions set to 1 and in
> the main route block I call setflag(1) for INVITE messages. Is that
> all I should have to do?
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
>
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:48:37 +0100, Klaus Darilion
> <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
>
>>Hi Paul!
>>
>>Try to set failed_transactions.
>>
>>from acc/README:
>>1.3.5. failed_transactions (integer)
>>
>> Should be failed transactions (status>=300) accounted too ?
>>
>> Default value is 0 (no).
>>
>> Example 1-5. failed_transactions example
>>modparam("acc", "failed_transactions", 1)
>>
>>regards,
>>klaus
>>
>>
>>Java Rockx wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi All.
>>>
>>>How do I get SER to account for failed INVITE messages? For example,
>>>if someone attempts to call a PSTN number and they do not have the
>>>free-pstn ACL, then our server replies with a 503 Service Unavailable.
>>>
>>>I'd like to see this appear in the MySQL acc table.
>>>
>>>Do I just use the setflag() function in the failure route for INVITEs?
>>>
>>>For example:
>>>
>>>route {
>>>
>>> t_on_failure("1");
>>> if (!t_relay()) {
>>> sl_reply_error();
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>}
>>>
>>>faillure_route[1] {
>>> if (method=="INVITE") {
>>> setflag(1);
>>> }
>>>}
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list