[Serusers] rtpproxy question

[maka]

Thank you Maxim. Is this(bridge) the right mode for using rtpproxy in
conjunction with nathelper? There was no nathelper and
fix_nated_contact() or fix_nated_sdp() involved in the alg.cfg sample
configuration file, but I assume this is due to that both the internal
and external networks are RFC1918. Is there a special way to invoke
rtpproxy when using with nathelper, or a special way beyond the one
that is specified in the nathelper example configuraiton?

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:09:59 +0200, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax at portaone.com> wrote:
> maka wrote:
> > hi all,
> > I am trying to run nathelper with rtpproxy, and I am currently using a
> > configuration based on a supposedly working standard example config,
> > but I haven't got it to work yet.
> >
> > I took a look at an example configuration for SER as an application
> > layer gateway,between two RFC1918 networks, and noticed that rtpproxy
> > was called with some parameters in there (i.e. force_rtp_prpoxy(EI),
> > obviously denoting the direction from External network tow an Internal
> > one)
> >
> > Does anyone know if these parameters are mandatory? Or if someone has
> > a currently working nathelper/rtpproxy configuration, please provide
> > any feedback on that.
> 
> Yes, they are if you are using rtpproxy in the "bridge" mode. The reason
> for that is that rtpptoxy has no way to see if the message goes from
> inside out or vice versa.
> 
> -Maxim
> 
> > I also keep getting a "cannot extract body from the message" error
> > from the rtpproxy.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
> 


-- 
Do you know where friendship ends 
and passion does begin?
It's between the binding 
of her stockings and her skin...