[Serusers] mediaproxy and private ip

[Greger V. Teigre]

Message:-) Thanks, now I understand. See inline.

  ok,
  Thanks for answering ;)

  I will reformulate

  Using ser.cfg from onsip.org version 5.

  When Uas register to ser, they are register with their privates IPs (192.168.xxx.xxx), not with the public Ip of the natted network.
So serctl ul show will show the private address for the UA?  If so, for some reason the client_nat_test does not detect the NATed client, an ngrep of the registration will help.

  Making a call requires proxy authentification but ser WWW-Challenge never arrives to UA(wrong adress).
  Register works, even with authentification.
The challenge is not sent to the registered address, but rather to the originator of the request. An ngrep trace of the INVITE will again help.  The challenge response will normally be sent to the source ip and port, not the contact (which BTW also should be fixed by calling fix_nated_contact())
g-)

  Any idea

  In tha cfg, I have :


   if (method=="INVITE" && client_nat_test("7")) {
    # INSERT YOUR IP ADDRESS HERE
    record_route_preset("82.146.xxx.xxx:5060;nat=yes");
   } else if (method!="REGISTER") { 
    record_route(); 
   };
   and also :
   if (!search("^Contact:[ ]*\*") && client_nat_test("7")) {
    setflag(6);
    fix_nated_register();
    force_rport();
   };

   if (!www_authorize("finalcut.be","subscriber")) {
    www_challenge("finalcut.be","0");
    break;
   };



    -----Message d'origine-----
    De : Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger at teigre.com] 
    Envoyé : jeudi 6 octobre 2005 14:10
    À : Olivier Taylor; serusers at lists.iptel.org
    Objet : Re: [Serusers] mediaproxy and private ip


    Olivier,
    You complained about no one answering your questions.  An advise: When writing a question, please state clearly what you want to accomplish, what the problem is, and as much information about the problem as possible.
    I have rechecked some of your recent posts, they are all in telegraph language, and I find it very hard to understand what your question really is.
    To be honest, the below question really makes no sense to me.
    g-)

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Olivier Taylor 
      To: serusers at lists.iptel.org 
      Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 01:44 PM
      Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy and private ip


      Using the last cfg from onsip.org, i just see that now Uas are registered with their private Ip when using mediaproxy.
      Mediaproxy seems the best solution for scalability, that's why I want to test it.

      Any Idea?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      Serusers mailing list
      serusers at lists.iptel.org
      http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20051006/65a1e06a/attachment.htm>