[Users] Problem with module dispatcher funtion ds_next_dst()
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at voice-system.ro
Tue Jul 11 08:23:44 CEST 2006
Hi,
yes, that's right. OpenSER 1.0.1 dispatcher module does not contain the
function/parameter you want to use. See:
http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.0.x/dispatcher.html
You need to use the 1.1.0 version:
http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/dispatcher.html
regards,
bogdan
Peter Childs wrote:
>I believe that the failover in the dispatcher was only introduced in the
>OpenSER 1.1 (not 1.0.1).
>
>On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 19:06 -0500, Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
>
>
>>Hi, somebody can help me?? I am trying to set up OpenSer 1.0.1 like
>>dispatcher to loadbalance and failover but when I use ds_next_dst()
>>for failover I obtain the next error:
>> 0(19024) parse error (128,25-26): unknown command, missing
>>loadmodule?
>>
>>
>
>
> ds_select_dst("2","0");
> sl_send_reply("100","Trying");
> forward(uri:host, uri:port);
> t_on_failure("1");
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> return;
> };
>
>Wouldn't you do the following (OpenSER will do 100 for you... and you
>don't need to forward() and t_relay()...
>
> ds_select_dst("2", "0");
> t_on_failure("1");
> if( !t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> return;
> };
>
>
>Just a thought...
>
>Also, in your example, failure_route[1] will be called for things like
>404 (not found), and 486 (busy), and you will be attempting the same
>thing again using different media gateways etc...
>
>I get around this by using a t_on_reply("1") and in onreply_route[1] do
>
>if( status =~ "18[0-9]" ) {
> t_on_failure("0");
>}
>
>So if you get a provisional response from your media gateway (ie a 180
>Ringing, or 183 Session Progress) you don't do any more gateway attempts
>if you then get a 4xx/5xx/6xx response....
>
>You may also wish in route{} to split out the handling of CANCEL, BYE,
>and INVITE. You want your INVITE to do the ds_select_dst(), but you
>should just be able to t_relay() your CANCELs and BYEs and OpenSER will
>match them to the selected destination based on an existing transaction.
>
>YMMV but this is similar to what I have been doing and testing with
>OpenSER.
>
>Cheers,
> Peter
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users at openser.org
>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list