[Serusers] About the failure route problem
Andrey Kouprianov
andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com
Thu Sep 7 09:20:15 CEST 2006
Hi,
I've never seen this kind of config before. Meaning I never see anyone
call a route block from failure_route. Try put route block's contents
into failure_route. Plus, you forward before you even set the failure
route.. Im not sure if that's a good idea too.
Andrey.
P.S - Maybe someone can suggest more on this issue??
On 9/7/06, AR. <arr at alumni.csie.ncu.edu.tw> wrote:
>
> Hi all
> I have a problme about the failure route
>
> My scenario is that:
> If voice gateway 1 is busy then forward the call to the voice gateway 2
>
> My config is :
> route[5] {
> rewritehostport("voice_gateway_1:5060");
> forward(uri:host, uri:port);
> t_on_failure("2");
> if(isflagset(1))
> append_branch();
> setflag(1);
> t_relay();
> break;
> }
> failure_route[2] {
> route(6);
> }
> route[6] {
> rewritehostport("voice_gateway_2:5060");
> forward(uri:host, uri:port);
> break;
> }
> But it still doesn't work
> anyone help?
>
> Best Regards
> AR.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list