[Serusers] SER 0.9.6 with H.264 Problem!
Steven Wong
mystevenwong at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 23 03:46:31 CET 2007
Hello All:
You will find enclosed our ser.cfg file that I have adapted from a very generous SIP user from the Internet.
This ser.cfg file work perfectly with Audio (IP Phone and Softphone). But when I am trying to use a Video Phone (we did try with GrandStream GXV-3000 Video Phone), it just giving us Audio but NOT Video. I did also try the same GrandStream GXV-3000 Video Phone with FreeWorldDialup and it is working fine with Video.
We have checked the etherreal output while trying to make a call and we are having this type of errors on the etherreal:
-----
RTP Protocol
Source IP (The IP of the Video Phone) and Destination IP (The IP of the SER Server) ------­ Payload Type = Unknown (126)
ICMP Protocol
Source IP (The IP of the SER Server) and Destination IP (The IP of the Video Phone) ------­Destination Unreachable (Port Unreacheable)
These 2 errors repeated six time before it stop with a good signal of:
Payload Type = ITU-T G.711 PCMU
Then the audio start but without audio.
---
Would you please tell us what is going wrong with this ser.cfg file? your answer is greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Steven Wong
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
debug=3
fork=yes
log_stderror=no
check_via=no
dns=no
rev_dns=no
listen=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX # INSERT YOUR IP ADDRESS HERE
# port=5060
children=3
alias="HOST.DOMAINNAME.COM"
alias="XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX"
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:PASSWORD@localhost/ser"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/uri_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so"
modparam("auth_db|uri_db|usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://ser:PASSWORD@localhost/ser")
modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", 1)
modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30)
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1)
modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock")
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
#---Accounting params
modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len >= max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
# !! Nathelper
# Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is
# executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses
# in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also,
# the received test should, if completed, should check all
# vias for rpesence of received
if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
# Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that
# a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is
# a REGISTER
if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) {
log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n");
# This will work only for user agents that support symmetric
# communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is
# smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration
# option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is
# called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling".
fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling
if (method == "INVITE") {
fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP
};
force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via
setflag(6); # Mark as NATed
};
};
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
# subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
# use different transport protocol
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
if (loose_route()) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
setflag(1);
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
# (in case, it does not work, use the following command
# with proper names and addresses in it)
if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize("HOST.DOMAINNAME.COM", "subscriber")) {
www_challenge("HOST.DOMAINNAME.COM", "0");
break;
};
save("location");
break;
};
lookup("aliases");
if (!uri==myself) {
append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
};
append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
route(1);
}
route[1]
{
# !! Nathelper
if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){
sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses");
break;
};
# if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay
if (isflagset(6)) {
force_rtp_proxy();
};
# NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example,
# re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as
# NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies
t_on_reply("1");
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably
# even for UDP2TCP
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
# !! Nathelper
onreply_route[1] {
# NATed transaction ?
if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") {
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
# otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not
# know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts)
} else if (nat_uac_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20070222/c13cbfa3/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list