[Serusers] sl module functions in failure route

[SIP]

You CAN call a non-failure route from within a failure route if you want 
to do some tricks. 

But why call t_relay directly from a failure route? Wouldn't the fact 
that it's in a failure route imply that t_relay failed to complete?

N.


JF wrote:
> So, the following snippet doesn't make sense in a failure route?
> I may try to call t_relay inside a failure route, and, if it fails,
> send a stateless reply back...
>
>         if (!t_relay()) {
>                 sl_send_reply("500","Error relaying");
>                 exit;
>         };
>
> JF
>
> On 7/11/07, Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org> wrote:
>   
>> At 16:34 11/07/2007, JF wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Is there any particular reason why sl module functions cannot be used
>>> in failure routes?
>>>       
>> Yes. Failure_route is only invoked from within stateful processing.
>> If a request was processed statelessly, SER does not really know if
>> it failed.
>>
>> -jiri
>>
>>     
>>> I want to send a stateless reply in failure route.
>>>
>>> JF
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>       
>>
>> --
>> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>>
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>