[Serusers] [Serdev] loose_route behaviour, detecting single Route with myself

[Klaus Darilion]

Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> Ok, what would be the difference then between this new process_routes() 
> function and adding more different return values to the existing 
> loose_route() function?

We could change the behavior without causing problems to old config 
files and we could give it a better name.

regards
klaus