[Serusers] Which version of SER to use?

[lists at infoway.net]

Excellent news. Thanks for the feedback. Overall, and please don't take this negatively, I think documentation for SER is difficult for beginners, so if we have to go through the learning curve anyway, we might as well do it in the newer version.

Thanks again

On Tue, May 8, 2007 5:04 pm, SIP <sip at arcdiv.com> said:

> For all intents and purposes, SER 2.0 (the new one) is ready for use.
> The only thing it's really waiting on to be 'stable' is some better
> documentation.  However, it's best, if you're just getting started, to
> deploy with the new version and maybe muddle your way through a bit
> until documentation is complete.
> 
> N.
> 
> 
> lists at infoway.net wrote:
>> We are planning on deploying a couple of SER servers and integrate them with
>> either SEMS or Asterisk for voicemail. However, we are a bit confused as to which
>> version of SER to go with? From what we can tell, the latest stable version is
>> 0.9.6. However, we know of the new 0.10.X version. Reading up on the site, there
>> is some documentation that explains a little bit of the differences and/or
>> migration recommendations/steps.
>>
>> So, in an effort to keep life as simple as possible, which version should we work
>> with? We are afraid that if we go through a learning cycle with 0.9.6 we're going
>> to "suffer" when migrating to the new version, either because of the learning
>> curve or because of a potential painful migration process.
>>
>> Any recommendations?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
> 
>