[Serusers] Is ser-oob.cfg compatible with 2.0 rc1?

[x-ser at sidell.org]

On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:55:31 +0200, Martin Hoffmann wrote:

> x-ser at sidell.org wrote:
> > When I try to have ser check the ser-oob.cfg configuration file, I get
> > the following errors:
> > 
> > [root at henry ser]# ser -f /usr/local/etc/ser/ser-oob.cfg -c
> >  0(4979) parse error (143,1-10): syntax error
> >  0(4979) parse error (143,1-10):
> > ERROR: bad config file (2 errors)
> 
> Can you please also post the line in question? There is two versions of
> ser-oob.cfg (one for 2.0 and one for CVS head aka 2.1). Both seem not to
> have anything offending at line 143 from what I can see.

Hi, Martin.

I think I'm using the ser-oob.cfg from the cvs head.  Below is the
group of lines surrounding line 143.  Line 143 is "phone2tel=no".  The
error occurs with a clean build of ser 2.0 rc1.

Perhaps I should do what you suggest in your earlier message, and use
a recent 2.0 daily snapshot instead.

# $Id: ser-oob.cfg,v 1.1.2.20 2008/06/11 14:53:45 janakj Exp $
...
check_via=no            # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no                  # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no              # (cmd. line: -R)
#port=5060
#children=4 
#user=ser                  
#group=ser                       
#disable_core=yes       # disables core dumping
open_files_limit=20480  # sets the open file descriptors limit
#mhomed=yes             # usefull for multihomed hosts, small
performance    
                        # penalty   
disable_tcp=no          # be conservative about enabling TCP -- it can
                        # degrade performance a lot
#tcp_accept_aliases=yes # accepts the tcp alias via option (see NEWS)
phone2tel=no            # ignore user=phone in request-URIs --
otherwise
                        # these URIs would be interpreted as
equivalent
         # to TEL URIs, and their lookup would fail in URI
         # database
reply_to_via=no 


-- 
Mark