[SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 stops processing messages

Santiago Gimeno santiago.gimeno at gmail.com
Thu May 13 12:26:00 CEST 2010


Hi,

We don't use any flags in the t_replicate function, just the uri of the
backup proxy.
I think we are not creating any transaction before t_replicate.

Thanks,

Santi

2010/5/13 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>

>  Hello,
>
> what are the parameters for t_replicate(), any flags? Do you create a
> transaction for register before t_replicate (e.g., by calling t_newtran in
> config)?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>
> On 5/13/10 11:53 AM, Santiago Gimeno wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It happens randomly, after some hours or some days, no particular pattern.
> There is no error message in the syslog. The debug level is set at 0. Would
> a higher debug level help to track the issue?
> We only use t_replicate to send the REGISTER to a backup proxy.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Santi
>
> 2010/5/13 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> seems to be something related to t_replicate(). Can you reproduce it
>> easily? If not, how often does it happen? Do you see any particular error
>> messages in syslog, before frozen?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/10 10:39 AM, Santiago Gimeno wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> I'm working with Kamailio 1.5 (rev 5968) and from time to time kamailio
>> freezes and stops processing messages. Kamailio is working only in UDP. I
>> really don't know in which conditions this problem is happening: it happens
>> both in high and low load.
>> Here is a backtrace of one of the UDP working processes when kamailio is
>> frozen (all the other UDP process backtraces look similar) :
>>
>> #0  0xb7fdf410 in ?? ()
>> #1  0xbfbfec28 in ?? ()
>> #2  0x00000001 in ?? ()
>> #3  0xa7392ad0 in ?? ()
>> #4  0xb7f3b4ac in sched_yield () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
>> #5  0xb7ba9463 in lock_hash (i=10361) at ../../mem/../fastlock.h:182
>> #6  0xb7bc4587 in t_lookup_request (p_msg=0x823fc70, leave_new_locked=1)
>> at t_lookup.c:468
>> #7  0xb7bc54ae in t_newtran (p_msg=0x823fc70) at t_lookup.c:1124
>> #8  0xb7bb740c in t_relay_to (p_msg=0x823fc70, proxy=0x0, flags=1) at
>> t_funcs.c:212
>> #9  0xb7bb8f6c in t_replicate (p_msg=0x823fc70, dst=0x817cdf8, flags=1) at
>> t_fwd.c:763
>> #10 0xb7bc7fce in w_t_replicate (p_msg=0x823fc70, dst=0x817cdf8
>> "\230ê\030\b\016", flags=0x0) at tm.c:957
>> #11 0x0805301c in do_action (a=0x818eb20, msg=0x823fc70) at action.c:874
>> #12 0x080557aa in run_action_list (a=0x818eb20, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:145
>> #13 0x08054491 in do_action (a=0x818ec78, msg=0x823fc70) at action.c:746
>> #14 0x080557aa in run_action_list (a=0x818c940, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:145
>> #15 0x08053efb in do_action (a=0x81b38e0, msg=0x823fc70) at action.c:120
>> #16 0x080557aa in run_action_list (a=0x81b3878, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:145
>> #17 0x08054491 in do_action (a=0x81b5f00, msg=0x823fc70) at action.c:746
>> #18 0x080557aa in run_action_list (a=0x81b5f00, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:145
>> #19 0x08054f2d in do_action (a=0x81b5f68, msg=0x823fc70) at action.c:752
>> #20 0x080557aa in run_action_list (a=0x81b5f68, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:145
>> #21 0x08054f2d in do_action (a=0x81b5fd0, msg=0x823fc70) at action.c:752
>> #22 0x080557aa in run_action_list (a=0x81aefd0, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:145
>> #23 0x08053efb in do_action (a=0x818bc08, msg=0x823fc70) at action.c:120
>> #24 0x080557aa in run_action_list (a=0x8187910, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:145
>> #25 0x08055b43 in run_top_route (a=0x8187910, msg=0x823fc70) at
>> action.c:120
>> #26 0x0808c659 in receive_msg (
>>     buf=0x8158040 "REGISTER sip:xxxxxxxxxxx.com SIP/2.0\r\nFrom: <
>> sip:xxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxx.com <sip%3Axxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxx.com>>;tag=as516fcce2\r\nTo:
>> <sip:xxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxx.com <sip%3Axxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxx.com>>\r\nCall-ID:
>> 01e4ea8e185c85332ea68874543c810e at xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com\r\nCSeq: 383
>> REGISTER\r\nVia: SIP"..., len=794, rcv_info=0xbfc004d4) at receive.c:175
>> #27 0x080c3ea3 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:449
>> #28 0x0806e394 in main (argc=9, argv=0xbfc006b4) at main.c:774
>>
>> Any idea of what might be happening?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Santi
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> * http://www.asipto.com/
>> * http://twitter.com/miconda
>> * http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> Kamailio Advanced Training for Carriers
> June 21-23, 2010, Miami, Fl, USA
> * http://www.asipto.com/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100513/8438a372/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list