[SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5.4 - Pike module ignoring remove_latancy parameter

Miguel Baptista miguel.baptista at uninett.no
Fri Sep 10 13:58:19 CEST 2010


Hi All,

I'm running kamailio-1.5.4-tls and I want to enable pike module in it.
I did some test but it isn't working properly. I mean it isn't acting
according to the /remove_latancy/ parameter. When an IP address is
blocked (cause it triggered the pike module), it should be blocked for
the amount of time (seconds I presumed) defined on the /remove_latancy
/parameter, right? but it isn't

Here is my pike module config (it's just a test config)
 
#  ---- Pike --- /* we are usign default values. We should tunning it up */
modparam("pike", "sampling_time_unit", 30)    
modparam("pike", "reqs_density_per_unit", 10)
modparam("pike", "remove_latency", 3600)     
modparam("pike", "pike_log_level",-1)


and here is the output

/Sep 10 *13:33:35* sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21414]: PIKE -
BLOCKing ip XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, node=0xb5a2eb58
Sep 10 13:33:35 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21414]: Warning: too
many requests from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060
Sep 10 *13:34:12* sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21420]: PIKE -
UNBLOCKing node 0xb5a2eb58
...

Sep 10 *13:35:22* sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21418]: PIKE -
BLOCKing ip XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX,, node=0xb5a2eb58
Sep 10 13:35:22 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21418]: Warning: too
many requests from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX,:5060
Sep 10 *13:36:12* sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21420]: PIKE -
UNBLOCKing node 0xb5a2eb58
/
Shouldn't it be blocked for 3600 seconds?
 
Then I changed the /remove_latancy/ parameter to /modparam("pike",
"remove_latency", 334500)    /
/
Sep 10 *13:37:09* sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21462]: PIKE -
BLOCKing ip XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX,, node=0xb5986b90
Sep 10 13:37:09 sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21462]: Warning: too
many requests from XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX,:5060
Sep 10 *13:37:52* sip /home/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[21466]: PIKE -
UNBLOCKing node 0xb5986b90
/
but the it didn't seem to have any real difference.

Any ideas? /
/
Best Regards,

Miguel Baptista
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100910/1af7e42c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list