[SR-Users] about syn_branch

[Jiri Kuthan]

On 3/7/11 10:40 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> see above.  we have seen rfc3261 sip user agents that don't understand
> branch=0 value

That's probably good enough argument, as some newer implementations may
give up on RFC2543 backwards compatibility and complaing about lack of
branch.

> and matching of ack fails.
> so instead of doing full md5
> calculation, it would make sense to use rfc3261 compliant constant
> rather than 0.

Agreed, that would probably serve the purpose well.

-jiri