[SR-Users] no socket found for match second RR

[Juha Heinanen]

Ovidiu Sas writes:

> I forgot to reply to you that I added that warning in the code for the
> same reason.
> What do you mean by a parameter that disables looking for the socket?

hi ovidiu,

the piece of code currently looks like this:

		if (enable_double_rr && is_2rr(&puri.params)) {
			/* double route may occure due different IP and port, so force as
			 * send interface the one advertise in second Route */
			if (parse_uri(rt->nameaddr.uri.s,rt->nameaddr.uri.len,&puri)<0) {
				LM_ERR("failed to parse the double route URI\n");
				return RR_ERROR;
			}
			si = grep_sock_info( &puri.host, puri.port_no, puri.proto);
			if (si) {
				set_force_socket(_m, si);
			} else {
				if (enable_socket_mismatch_warning)f
					LM_WARN("no socket found for match second RR\n");
			}

when the "disable socket check" parameter would have been given either
globally or per loose_route() call, then this part of the code would not
be executed at all:

			si = grep_sock_info( &puri.host, puri.port_no, puri.proto);
			if (si) {
				set_force_socket(_m, si);
			} else {
				if (enable_socket_mismatch_warning)f
					LM_WARN("no socket found for match second RR\n");
			}


which would save some cpu cycles.

-- juha