[SR-Users] Crash Kamailio 4.1.3

[Igor Potjevlesch]

Hello,

We do not access to the P-asserted-identity in our configuration but
we added the field PAI in the db base ACC ( for INVITE, ACK and BYE) .
I dont know if it's in request_route, failure_route or branch_route .

This is the print :

(gdb) p mem_block
$3 = (struct qm_block *) 0x7f6a6bef1010
(gdb) p shm_block
$4 = (struct qm_block *) 0x7f6a5666a000

Regards,

Igor


2014-06-11 18:02 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:

>  Hello,
>
> cloning to shm for tm seems ok. Can you tell where you access
> P-Asserted-Identity header, via variables? Does it happen in request_route,
> failure_route or branch_route?
>
> Can you print from gdb, any frame:
>
> p mem_block
> p shm_block
>
> I want to see if parsed filed point to shm or pkg memory.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 11/06/14 17:37, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> at least I narrowed it down a bit. It is empty also in the clone stored in
> transaction, so it happens either during cloning or before. I will have to
> check these parts.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 11/06/14 17:00, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>
>  This is the result, always for frame 5 :
>
>  (gdb) p *t->uas.request->pai
> $1 = {type = HDR_PAI_T, name = {
>     s = 0x7f6a60cd34b8 "P-Asserted-Identity: \"0987654321\"
> <sip:0987654321 at A.B.C.D>\r\nContact: <sip:0987654321 at A.B.C.D:5060>\r\nAllow:
> INVITE, BYE, REGISTER, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO,
> REFER, UPD"..., len = 19}, body = {
>     s = 0x7f6a60cd34cd "\"0987654321\"<sip:0987654321 at A.B.C.D>\r\nContact:
> <sip:0987654321 at A.B.C.D:5060>\r\nAllow: INVITE, BYE, REGISTER, ACK,
> OPTIONS, CANCEL, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, UPDATE\r\nSupported:
> path,"..., len = 43}, len = 66, parsed = 0x7f6a6d81da88, next =
> 0x7f6a60cd3f10}
>
> (gdb) p *((p_id_body_t*)(t->uas.request->pai->parsed))
> $2 = {id = 0x0, num_ids = 0, next = 0x0}
>
>  *Did *you find one thing in common between the 2 occurrences? Do you
> have any ideas about what is the cause of this pai reset?
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Igor
>
>
>
>
> 2014-06-11 16:09 GMT+02:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>
>>  Hello,
>>
>> in the same frame 5, can yo get:
>>
>> p *t->uas.request->pai
>> p *((p_id_body_t*)(t->uas.request->pai->parsed))
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 10/06/14 18:35, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>>
>>  Hello,
>>
>>  Here is the results :
>>
>>  (gdb) frame 5
>> #5  0x00007f6a687e9b43 in acc_onreply (t=0x7f6a60d16ff8,
>> req=0x7f6a60cd2c10, reply=0x7f6a6c119aa8, code=200) at acc_logic.c:471
>> 471                     acc_db_request(req);
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140611/9055433f/attachment.html>