[SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices
Ali Taher
ataher at vanrise.com
Mon Jun 1 09:21:26 CEST 2015
Hi Juha,
Yes I know , I gave 192.168.26.4 smaller priority , then 192.168.26.1 then
192.168.26.6.
So in this way gateways must be ordered as 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 ,
192.168.26.6.
Yet I got them ordered as 192.168.26.6, 192.168.26.4 , 192.168.26.1 ,
192.168.26.6.
If as you're saying it's sorting issue , then why I got 192.168.26.6 gateway
twice (at the first and at the end).
Regards,
Ali
-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Juha Heinanen
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 10:17 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio LCR Multiple choices
Ali Taher writes:
> Everything works fine so far , yet I have a problem that last gateway
> comes first, then gateways are ordered correctly.
hard to say anything based on the information you gave. smaller tuple
priority value means higher priority.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
More information about the sr-users
mailing list