[SR-Users] question about RTPengine

[Dmitry]

When I make internal call between 2 internal subscribers (yate softphones). The subscriber B answeres, after all the Kamailio/rtpengine sends a 200ok  reply to the subscriber A,
but the softphone does not recognize it (it does not ACK it). I think it is because of its SDP which the RTPENGINE replaced with it's one.

is it possible to instruct the RTPENGINE not to insert these extra lines  or should I use, say LUA, to remove these extra SDP lines.

What is the correct  way here 

    On Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:36 PM, Dmitry <mbike2000ru at yahoo.com> wrote:
 

 
[SR-Users] question about RTPengine

Does it mean that rtpengine_manage() determine the session state itself? i.e it is not needed to find out in the configuration file that INVITE contains SDP or not because rtpengine_manage() determins internally what this INVITE is? am I correct? 

    On Friday, May 6, 2016 5:52 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
 

 ‎It's just a description of stateful behaviour in relation to the SDP offer-answer cycle.
‎
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309
United States

Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

Sent from my BlackBerry.
  Original Message  
From: Dmitry
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 07:43
To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Reply To: Dmitry
Subject: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine


_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


   

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160610/5af14325/attachment.html>