[SR-Users] Dispatcher with kam & fs behind nat

[Alex Balashov]

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:28:26AM -0500, Daniel Greenwald wrote:

> Cool! Thanks for the fast and thorough response. I will try this out.

You're very welcome!

> Would TCP not work the same way, if I omit udp?

Indeed it should. 

A common approach is to use TCP at the customer access edge and use UDP
inside your core for maximal efficiency, but it depends on what kind of
services you're delivering (e.g. whether you're prone to big packets
that get fragmented, whether you have big MTUs, etc.), as well as
customs, habits and tastes in general.

-- 
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) 
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/