<DIV>Hi,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>We are also having a problem with X-Pro and X-lite build 1088 when registering to a SIP proxy based on libosip. The X-Pro is not using the double-quotes on the nonce value of the Authorization header, which is causing an error on our proxy when parsing of this header (Libosip requires the double quotes).</DIV>
<DIV>I have sent this question to the Xten support forum but they said that the double quotes are not mandatory, though libosip requires them.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Any thoughts on what is the correct behaviour of the double-quotes on the authorization header?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV>Chuck</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>########</DIV>
<DIV>REGISTER sip:sip.myproxy.com SIP/2.0.. <BR>Via: SIP/2.0/UDP <BR>10.0.0.118:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK68B8733FC802462491336DC291698245.. <BR>From: 55519 <sip:55519@sip.myproxy.com>.. <BR>To: 55519 <sip:55519@sip.trd c.telenova.com.br>.. <BR>Contact: "55519" <sip:55519@10.0.0.118:5060>.. <BR>Call-ID: <A href="mailto:C6A03D06E92E4797964B8B66D428E345@sip.myproxy.com"><FONT color=#006699>C6A03D06E92E4797964B8B66D428E345@sip.myproxy.com</FONT></A>.. <BR>CSeq: 50473 REGISTER..Expires: 1800.. <BR>Authorization: Digest <BR>username="55519",realm="sip.myproxy.com",nonce=3fc651184ade4892f2e774000507b <BR>8b0a1db524e,response="19a55431e3ee1d5978c777373a822a40",uri="sip:sip.myproxy <BR>.com".. <BR>Max-Forwards: 70.. <BR>User-Agent: X-PRO build 1088.. <BR>Content-Length: 0....</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><B><I>Klaus Darilion <darilion@ict.tuwien.ac.at></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR><BR>PS: nevertheless build 1095 (as 1088) is IMO buggy as it doesn't<BR>register to my default proxy, but to all other configured proxies. Any<BR>solutions?<BR><BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com] <BR>> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 5:56 PM<BR>> To: Ricardo Villa<BR>> Cc: Klaus Darilion; Jan Janak; Adrian Georgescu; serusers@lists.iptel.org<BR>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Ok, I see, probably it tries to send a RTCP packet, which is OK by <BR>> itself, but handles resulting ICMP in a strange way. I'll extend RTP <BR>> proxy to make it relaying RTCP traffic as well (I am having <BR>> it on a TODO <BR>> list for a quite some time now), which should fix this problem.<BR>> <BR>> Thank you for the debugging!<BR>> <BR>> In the meantime,
disabling RTCP in X-Ten should solve the problem.<BR>> <BR>> -Maxim<BR>> <BR>> Ricardo Villa wrote:<BR>> <BR>> > I can confirm this too. Just tried it in our lab with the <BR>> exact same<BR>> > results as Klaus. (Instead of Budgetone I used ATA186).<BR>> > <BR>> > X-Lite build 1084<BR>> > <BR>> > 1. ATA186 Calls Xten.<BR>> > 2. Xten hears choppy audio every 5 seconds or so.<BR>> > 3. RTP Stream from ATA to Xten is perfect and conserves <BR>> the same SSRC<BR>> > 4. RTP Stream from Xten to ATA switches to a new SSRC <BR>> every few seconds.<BR>> > <BR>> > It is clear to me that there is a bug in Xten software. Before Xten<BR>> > switches to a new SSRC it attempts to send an RTP packet to <BR>> the wrong RTP<BR>> > Port (it tries to the actual port +1). SER server sends <BR>> back "ICMP Port<BR>> > Unreacheable (Obviously)" and Xten restarts RTP Stream on a <BR>> new
SSRC.<BR>> > <BR>> > I did not see any problem with Maxims RTPProxy.<BR>> > <BR>> > Regards,<BR>> > Ricardo<BR>> > <BR>> > ----- Original Message ----- <BR>> > From: "Klaus Darilion" <DARILION@ICT.TUWIEN.AC.AT><BR>> > To: "Jan Janak" <JANAK@FOKUS.FRAUNHOFER.DE>; "Adrian Georgescu"<BR>> > <AG@AG-PROJECTS.COM><BR>> > Cc: <SERUSERS@IPTEL.ORG>; "Ricardo Villa" <RICVIL@EPM.NET.CO><BR>> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:07 AM<BR>> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > I can reproduce the choppy audio<BR>> > setup:<BR>> > budgetone-100 <----> ser+rtpproxy(version from today) on <BR>> redhat 9 (or 8,<BR>> > not sure) <------>x-lite build 1088 on win xp<BR>> > <BR>> > the choppy sound occours every 5 seconds, in both directions.<BR>> > RTP-analysis:<BR>> > RTP stream from budgetone to x-lite
(via rtpproxy) is fine <BR>> (no jitter,<BR>> > no loss)<BR>> > RTP stream from x-lite to budgetone (via rtpproxy): very <BR>> strange: x-lite<BR>> > switches to a new SSRC (and seq-nr. start at 0 again) every <BR>> 5 seconds.<BR>> > <BR>> > so, in my opinion: rtpproxy works fine, x-lite is guilty. <BR>> but why does<BR>> > this happen only if the rtp proxy is involved? ...further <BR>> investigations<BR>> > are planned...<BR>> > <BR>> > Klaus<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> >>-----Original Message-----<BR>> >>From: Jan Janak [mailto:janak@fokus.fraunhofer.de]<BR>> >>Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:09 PM<BR>> >>To: Adrian Georgescu<BR>> >>Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org; Ricardo Villa<BR>> >>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> >>Well, we can generate the traces locally, but I haven't <BR>>
encounter the<BR>> >>problem you describe so it makes no sense.<BR>> >><BR>> >>You wrote you are able to reproduce the problem, in that <BR>> case I would<BR>> >>like to ask you to generate the traces that show the problem<BR>> >>so we could<BR>> >>analyze and fix it.<BR>> >><BR>> >>Also please tell us on what OS does this happen ? (I mean the<BR>> >>OS the proxy<BR>> >>is running on).<BR>> >><BR>> >>Another question, what is the license of your RTP proxy ? I<BR>> >>didn't find<BR>> >>any licensing info in the sources. Will the sources be available ?<BR>> >><BR>> >> Jan.<BR>> >><BR>> >>On 10-12 16:04, Adrian Georgescu wrote:<BR>> >><BR>> >>>On Wednesday, Dec 10, 2003, at 15:48 Europe/Amsterdam,<BR>> >><BR>> >>Ricardo Villa<BR>> >><BR>> >>>wrote:<BR>>
>>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>>>Adrian,<BR>> >>>><BR>> >>>>Do you have an Etheral trace trace of such a call (using G711)?<BR>> >>><BR>> >>>I guess ethereal traces can be generated with ethereal program and<BR>> >>>decoded locally on your servers if you want to isolate this.<BR>> >>><BR>> >>><BR>> >>>>I can<BR>> >>>>decode it and produce an audio file for all to examine.<BR>> >><BR>> >>This way we<BR>> >><BR>> >>>>can get<BR>> >>>>to the bottom of this.<BR>> >>>>Thanks,<BR>> >>>>Ricardo<BR>> >>><BR>> >>>_______________________________________________<BR>> >>>Serusers mailing list<BR>> >>>serusers@lists.iptel.org<BR>> >>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers<BR>> >><BR>>
>>_______________________________________________<BR>> >>Serusers mailing list<BR>> >>serusers@lists.iptel.org<BR>> >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers<BR>> >><BR>> >><BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>> > Serusers mailing list<BR>> > serusers@lists.iptel.org<BR>> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers<BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> > <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Serusers mailing list<BR>serusers@lists.iptel.org<BR>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/slv/mailtag/*http://companion.yahoo.com/">Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now</a>