<DIV>Greg,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>We experienced similer problems when we tried to parallelly fork calls thru our PSTN gateway. All the calls had same call-id, and the only difference was the branch-id's in the via headers of the forked calls. The gateway accepted only the first call and rejected others. I asked about this in the sipping forum, and was informed that it could be a bug in the implementation of the UA server (PSTN gateways are UAS). The UAS has to consider branch-id's for the transactions. AFAIK, for a proxy, it is the combination of the Call-ID and the tags that uniquely identify the dialog. (Request others to correct if i am wrong on this). Not sure what exactly is your problem.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><B><I>Greg Fausak <greg@addabrand.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.<BR>SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has<BR>anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!<BR><BR>-g<BR><BR>Greg Fausak<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>Girish Gopinath <gr_sh2003@yahoo.com><p>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com