Perhaps the new mediaproxy-1.3 will fix this. I'm just graping for straws here.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Paul<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On Apr 11, 2005 4:55 PM, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ricardo Martinez</b> <<a href="mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net">rmartinez@redvoiss.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hello list.<br> Regarding to this issue. These are the results for my "production"<br>machine after upgrade the Python from 2.3 to 2.4.1.<br><br>Since Friday the %MEM is 0.5, as the output of the "top" command indicate :<br><br> PID
USER
PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME CPU COMMAND<br> 6131
root 15
0 5460 5460 2492 S
9.9 0.5 119:04 0<br>mediaproxy.py<br><br>So, it works!. For the record i'm using :<br><br>OS : Red Hat 9.0<br>Python : 2.4.1<br>SER: 0.8.14<br>mediaproxy : 1.2.1<br><br>Regards,<br>Ricardo Martinez.-<br><br>> -----Mensaje original-----<br>> De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:<a href="mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net">rmartinez@redvoiss.net</a>]<br>> Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 18:18<br>> Para: 'Lucas Aimaretto'; <a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org</a><br>> Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of<br>> RAM resources.<br>><br>><br>> Regarding to this issue<br>> Well, thanks to Lucas, just to test i changed the<br>> pyhton version in<br>> my "lab" server from python2.3 to pyhton2.4.1. I made the<br>> same test with<br>> the rtpgenerator and "voila".<br>><br>> Check it out :<br>><br>> Before 80 simultaneus calls :<br>><br>>
PID USER
PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME COMMAND<br>> 13915
root 15
0 4628 4628 2068 S
1.0 0.9 0:00<br>> mediaproxy.py<br>><br>> During the test :<br>><br>>
PID USER
PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME COMMAND<br>> 13915
root 25
0 4864 4864 2068
R 99.9 0.9 0:31<br>> mediaproxy.py<br>><br>> After the test :<br>><br>>
PID USER
PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME COMMAND<br>> 3356
root 15
0 1600 1600 1036 S
0.0 0.3 0:00 bash<br>> 13915
root 15
0 4864 4864 2068 S
0.0 0.9 0:44<br>> mediaproxy.py<br>><br>> 0.9 % !!!!!<br>><br>> I made the test a couples of times later and the %MEM used is<br>> still 0.9%.<br>> I guess that it was maybe a problem between the python2.3 and the<br>> mediaproxy? Don't know...<br>><br>> I'm going to change the python version in my production<br>> machine. i'm going<br>> to keep you inform about the results...<br>><br>> Thanks to Lucas...again.<br>><br>> Best Regards,<br>><br>> Ricardo Martinez.-<br>><br>> > -----Mensaje original-----<br>> > De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:<a href="mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net">rmartinez@redvoiss.net</a>]<br>> > Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 17:33<br>> > Para: 'Lucas Aimaretto'; <a href="mailto:serusers@iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org</a><br>> > Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of<br>> > RAM resources.<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > For example now i have 14 simultaneus calls.<br>> ><br>>
> PID USER
PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME<br>> > CPU COMMAND<br>> > 11760
root 15
0 601M 518M 2396
R 7.2<br>> 51.4<br>> > 69:10 0 mediaproxy.py<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > When the active calls are 0 again the CPU % reach 0.2%, but<br>> > the %MEM is<br>> > greater than 51.4%, and always increasing..<br>> > A couple of questions.<br>> > How you launch mediaproxy?. And in your last mail what are<br>> the pyhton<br>> > proccess running.. i don't see the mediaproxy process running.<br>> > Thanks again.<br>> ><br>> > Ricardo.-<br>> ><br>> > > -----Mensaje original-----<br>> > > De: Lucas Aimaretto [mailto:<a href="mailto:lucas@cyneric.com">lucas@cyneric.com</a>]<br>> > > Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 17:20<br>> > > Para: 'Ricardo Martinez'; <a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@iptel.org</a><br>> > > Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of<br>> > > RAM resources.<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> > > > But when you check the use of RAM memory in your machine...<br>> > > > (maybe with the command "top" or the command "free") don't<br>> > > > you notice a increasing amount of RAM used without being<br>> > > > released? As i mentioned i have this problem.. this is a<br>> > > > snippet of the output of the "top" command in my machine:<br>> > > ><br>>
> > > PID USER
PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU
%MEM TIME<br>> > > > CPU COMMAND<br>> >
> > 11760 root 15
0 590M
516M 2396 S
0.9<br>> > > 51.2<br>> > > > 68:15 0 mediaproxy.py<br>> > > ><br>> > > > 51.2% of memory used? What version of pyhton are you using?,<br>> > > > what OS are you using?. Thanks!<br>> > ><br>> > > Hey!, how many calls where you proxying when you had that usage of<br>> > > memmory ?<br>> > ><br>> > > Regards,<br>> > ><br>> > > Lucas<br>> > ><br>> > > --<br>> > > No virus found in this outgoing message.<br>> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.<br>> > > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date:<br>> > 07/04/2005<br>> > ><br>> > ><br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Serusers mailing list<br>> > <a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">Serusers@iptel.org</a><br>> > <a href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a><br>> ><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Serusers mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">Serusers@iptel.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a><br>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Serusers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org</a><br><a href="http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a><br></blockquote></div><br>