Yes. I posted our TCP/UDP patch to serdev, but it exceeded the 40K
limit and is pending approval AFAIK. This patch provides the exact same
functionality as the unix socket server - so it is not as complete as
the actual FIFO. For instance, Juha pointed out that the domain_reload
FIFO command doesn't work.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Paul<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/14/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Marian Dumitru</b> <<a href="mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro">marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Martin,<br><br>similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted<br>recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.<br><br>Best regards,<br>Marian<br><br>Martin Rusnak wrote:<br>> Dear all,
<br>><br>> I would like to connect my web portal based on java technology with<br>> the ser daemon in order to provide some administration functionality.<br>> The solution would be to use FIFO interface, but it has two major
<br>> disadvantages:<br>><br>> 1. The portal might be deployed on different host.<br>> 2. Although Java can communicate via FIFO pipeline, it cannot create<br>> a new pilepine.<br>><br>> Is there any possibility to manage ser daemon remotely via a socket
<br>> interface?<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>> Martin<br><br>--<br>Voice System<br><a href="http://www.voice-system.ro">http://www.voice-system.ro</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Serusers mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a><br></blockquote></div><br>