<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2668" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Unless the NAT is a symmetric NAT. Look at the incoming REGISTER messages
and how you detect NAT presence. There must be something in the message (or your
code, or your STUN) that sets the flag for that location. Use serctl ul show to
see whether the flag is set.</DIV>
<DIV>g-)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>---- Original Message ----<BR>From: Roger Lewau<BR>To:
serusers@lists.iptel.org<BR>Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 10:00 PM<BR>Subject:
[Serusers] STUN for NAT traversal...<BR><BR>> I'm trying to use STUN for NAT
traversal for all clients not using 1<BR>> to 1 NATing, and mediaproxy for
the rare few who does.But it seems<BR>> that all traffic is proxied anyway,
dont really understand why. I do<BR>> call the routeblock for mediaproxy
before relaying the call, but<BR>> since STUN is used it should not detect
that NAT is in place. Or am I<BR>> missing some
logic? <BR>> <BR>> Any Idea on how to accomplish
this?<BR>> <BR>> Kind regards<BR>> Roger - Getting one step closer to a
really god service everyday ;)<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> Serusers mailing
list<BR>> serusers@lists.iptel.org<BR>>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</DIV></BODY></HTML>