Does this work as a far-end NAT traversal solution (ALG running only where SER/Asterisk is hosted, not where UAs are located)?<br>
<br>
Mark<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/2/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">jeff kwong</b> <<a href="mailto:kwongfucius@gmail.com">kwongfucius@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi Waldo,<br>
<br>
I didn't do anything else outside the instructions as in the Getting
Started Manual from <a href="http://Onsip.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Onsip.org</a> for the SER with MySQL and connecting to
a PSTN gateway.I also got the config from there. I also got a good set
of tips for that in my previous posts here. As for the Siproxd, I just
followed the online docs here: <a href="http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://siproxd.sourceforge.net/</a> . <div><span class="e" id="q_10615575bfc102ff_1">
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/2/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Waldo Rubinstein</b> <<a href="mailto:waldo@trianet.net" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
waldo@trianet.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Wouldn't mind learning from your accomplishments. How about sharing
<br>some how-tos and/or config files?<br><br>Would be greatly appreciated.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Waldo<br><br>On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:58 AM, jeff kwong wrote:<br><br>> Hi Guys!<br>><br>> I just would like to share that I was able to get a working setup
<br>> using SER as Softswitch, Asterisk as PSTN gateway and SIPROXD on my<br>> NAT Router. SIPROXD is an open source ALG and it effectively<br>> handles sip nat traversals. With it I dont have to run a seperate<br>
> mediaproxy. When making calls from SIP UA to PSTN, RTP is as below:<br>><br>> UA---NAT/SIPROXD---ASTERISK<br>><br>> for 2 UA behind the same NAT:<br>><br>> UA1--NAT---UA2<br>><br>> and for 2 UA behind different NATs:
<br>><br>> UA1--NAT1----NAT2---UA2<br>><br>> Thus there is less latency on signals and less traffic on SER. My<br>> question is, from the experience of other guys here, what do you<br>> think is the drawback or advantages of using SIPROXD together with
<br>> SER to solve SIP NAT issues compared to other methods like using<br>> mediaproxy and rtpproxy?Will I still be able to do other SER<br>> features like accounting?<br>><br>><br>> Thanks!<br>> _jeff
<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Serusers mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Serusers@iptel.org
</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
</a><br>><br>
</blockquote></div>
</span></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Serusers mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers" target="_blank">
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>