<div>FYI - I just tested Asterisk 1.2 cvs HEAD and it also has this bug. I've got several WiFi phones that also have the problem. Seems to be an epidemic.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mark<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/30/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mark Aiken</b> <<a href="mailto:aiken.mark@gmail.com">aiken.mark@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br><br>
<div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/30/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Klaus Darilion</b> <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at" target="_blank">
klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br>That's a bad hack. Try to get a fix for the broken UA.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div> </div></span>
<div>If only that were an option. I will send them a bug report but its unlikely to be fixed soon and there are many, many in the field with many more deployed each day.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I am only thankful SER gives me the tools to fix this problem.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I think the problem with UAs being non-compliant with sutler aspects of the 'standard' RFCs is only going to become worse, as price pressures force the cost of SIP based CPE down. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>When John Wang discovers how to get a 256 byte SIP stack running in a .50c PIC from his garage in Taiwan, I doubt he will be to worried about Contact URI parameters.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>many thanks for your help on this.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mark</div></div></blockquote></div><br>