<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
1. DON'T have UA2 and SER on the same server. You are very likely to
get problems because SER sees it's own IP address in a message destined
for UA2<br>
2. Don't use t_newtran and t_forward_nonack_uri unless you know exactly
what you do (and probably not then either)<br>
3. When having problems like that, use a pretested Getting Started
config fil (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://iptel.org/ser/doc/gettingstarted">http://iptel.org/ser/doc/gettingstarted</a>). If you still have
the problem, there is something external (like UA2 on same box as SER).
Fix it and then compare the logic of your config file with the Getting
Started reference config<br>
g-)<br>
<br>
Zappasodi Daniele wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid14A9059A37EF9A45BC2520DE64C30F60075153@slttex002.seltatel.local"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello,
I have a big problem with the retransmissions.
In my tests sometimes the retransmission handler doesn't seem to work properly and it resends the INVITE after receiving a final response.
Moreover it doesn't respect the time-out (instead wait 1 second it resends the packet after few decimal), but this is a minor item.
An example:
INVITE sip:31203
>From 32201
UA1(32201) ---> SER ---> UA2(31203)
INVITE UA1 ---> SER ---> UA2
Trying UA1 <--- SER
183 UA1 <--- SER <--- UA2
480 UA1 <--- SER <--- UA2
ACK UA1 ---> SER ---> UA2
...
Other call.
After 0,5 msec SER sends again the first INVITE to UA2:
INVITE SER ---> UA2
183 SER <--- UA2
etc.
In the attached zipped file there are the syslog, the ser config file (only the relevant parts) and the ethereal captures related to this example.
Some additional information:
SER version is 0.9.2, compiled for arm.
In my scenario SER and UA2 are on the same box.
In LAN_capture.cap file there is the message flow between UA1 and SER, in lo_capture.cap between SER and UA2.
Can someone explain me this behaviour?
Maybe something wrong in my config file? Note that I use t_lookup_request, t_newtran, t_forward_nonack_uri in order to recognize retransmitted INVITE, could it be here the problem?
thanks
**********************************************************************
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or
omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message inerror.
**********************************************************************</pre>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org">Serusers@lists.iptel.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>