<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
MESSAGE should be NAT-handled as an INVITE.<br>
g-)<br>
<br>
Mark Price wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid6a12fd8d0610191446p5d0ee690we56cd88e6e090695@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Hi,<br>
<br>
I'm finding that my ser clients can't can only unreliably communicate
using MESSAGE packets, and that presence and presence subscriptions are
equally unreliable (i.e. very).<br>
The odd thing is that they do sometimes, in fact, work.
<br>
Anyways, I discovered that there are definitely NAT issues going on,
since I can see inbound MESSAGE packets banging on the outside of my
firewall.<br>
What are people doing to mitigate this?<br>
<br>
Mark<br>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org">Serusers@lists.iptel.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>