<div>So why not try to see the beautiful scene if Openser can run on every kind of server platform? </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Anyway, Windows Server system will not disappear in the seen future, and what's more, some organizations and companies still seriously rely on Windows, I mean if they found Openser can be integrated into their Enterprise application systems on hand, they will probably be very excited.
</div>
<div>Even as the common user, I believe our planet is looking forward to a power ,stable and free SIP server, just like Apache HTTP server!<br> </div>
<div>In order to fully understand the whole picture of Openser, I try to find some architecture documents, but I failed, who can do me a favor?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>So I try to figure out the relationship of some key modules as the attachment, any comments will be appreciated.<br> </div>
<div>Wanding.</div>
<div>Everythig is possible.</div>
<div>Everytime I am thinking.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/30/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Cesc</b> <<a href="mailto:cesc.santa@gmail.com">cesc.santa@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On 3/30/07, Juha Heinanen <<a href="mailto:jh@tutpro.com">jh@tutpro.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Cesc writes:
<br>><br>> > For one, in my company, we run<br>> > embedded linux AND windows embedded ... but we cannot have the same<br>> > proxy on both platforms, so you have to support two software units<br>
> > ... that is work!<br>><br>> why don't you ask your windows software to be ported to linux? then you<br>> would have only one platform to worry about.<br>><br>> -- juha<br>><br><br>:)<br>yes, i know, there is always two faces to a story ...
<br><br>Look, the "my-work" example was just to show that being flexible and<br>open is not bad ... of course it takes more effort; this is like all<br>in life, pros and cons.<br><br>Basically, going back to the origins of this thread: I think we should
<br>not bluntly discard new building ways just because one of the outcomes<br>may be a windows-based openser. Now, if all the porting needed can be<br>done with the current makefiles ... ok then.<br><br>Cesc<br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Users@openser.org">Users@openser.org</a><br><a href="http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users">http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br></blockquote></div>
<br>