This is very elegant, <br>However we are using lcr module for load distribution. The advantage is that if one server is not available/busy then ser will send call to another. <br><br>-Jai<br><a href="http://www.bingotelecom.com">
www.bingotelecom.com</a><br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/13/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michal Matyska</b> <<a href="mailto:michal@iptel.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
michal@iptel.org
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">This BIND zone file should do the job. Requests relayed to <a href="http://abc.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
abc.com</a><br>should go 60% to gw1 and 40% to gw2.<br><br><br>$TTL 86400<br>$ORIGIN <a href="http://abc.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">abc.com</a>.<br>@ IN SOA
<a href="http://ns.abc.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">ns.abc.com</a> root (<br> 1 ; serial
<br> 1H ; refresh<br> 10M ; retry<br> 1W ; expiry<br> 1D ) ; minimum
<br><br>; service rr pri weight port target<br>_sip._udp SRV 10 60 5060 gw1<br> SRV 10 40 5060 gw2<br><br>gw1 A <a href="http://192.168.1.1" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
192.168.1.1</a><br>gw2 A <a href="http://192.168.1.2" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">192.168.1.2</a><br><br><br>On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 17:54 +0200, inge wrote:<br>> Hi,<br>
><br>> Can we used DNS SRV for outgoing call ? Can you show me an example ?
<br>><br>> Thanks.<br>><br>> Sincerly,<br>><br>> Adrien .L<br>><br>> Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007 à 10:16 -0400, Michal Matyska a écrit :<br>> > Hi,<br>> ><br>> > in SER 2.0 you can use DNS system with properly configured SRV records
<br>> > to achieve load balancing with non-equal distribution.<br>> ><br>> > Michal<br>> ><br>> > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote:<br>> > > Hi all,<br>> > ><br>
> > > Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on SER for<br>> > > outgoing calls ?<br>> > ><br>> > > I want to distribute the calls between two gateways. Ideally, with a<br>
> > > coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and 40% for the second).<br>> > ><br>> > > Thanks for your support.<br>> > ><br>> > > Adrien .L<br>> > ><br>> > > _______________________________________________
<br>> > > Serusers mailing list<br>> > > <a href="mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Serusers@lists.iptel.org</a><br>> > > <a href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
</a><br>> ><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Serusers mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">Serusers@lists.iptel.org
</a><br><a href="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</a><br></blockquote></div><br>