<div>Hi Bogdan,</div>
<div> Thanks for the quick reply.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> The behavior rfc3261 mentions for using q values is a common ordering mechanism (Section 16.6) . I guess variants as such would not be against rfc3261.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> I was suggesting that we could have additional flexibility added to what the LCR module is currently doing. Otherwise i would almost rework what is already there in the LCR module (to get list ordered by qvalues into AVPs)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div> A use case for the above request is where contacts for an AOR are distributed in a system. The UA's come up with qvalue based on there utilization etc. The idea is to send the call to the contact who has been least used. I cannot enforce that the qvalues generated by the UA's are unique unless I use a sequencing mechanism between the UA's. </div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>Amit </div>
<div> </div>
<div> <br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/27/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Bogdan-Andrei Iancu</b> <<a href="mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro">bogdan@voice-system.ro</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi Amit,<br><br>First of all, the behaviour you want to achieve is against RFC3261<br>(forking based on q value), but for sure you know better what you try to<br>
get ;)<br><br>Now, depending where you take the list of destinations from, let's<br>assume you can get them into AVPs. For how to do serial forking from<br>AVPs, see:<br> <a href="http://www.voice-sistem.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking">http://www.voice-sistem.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking</a><br>
<br>Regards,<br>Bogdan<br><br><br>Amit Sharma wrote:<br>> Hi All,<br>><br>> I am a newbie to this list so please forgive me if the question below<br>> has been discussed before. I could not find anything related so i am<br>
> sending my query.<br>><br>> I have been looking at the LCR module to do serial forking since we<br>> want to prioritize contacts based on q values. However, we do not want<br>> to fork in parallel to contacts even if they share the same q value.<br>
> AFAIK,this is currently not possible with the LCR module.<br>><br>> Would it be a good idea to have a parameter (e.g "append-branches")<br>> in the LCR module which can control the forking behavior when q value<br>
> of contacts is the same?<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>> Amit<br>><br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> Users mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Users@lists.openser.org">Users@lists.openser.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users">http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
><br><br></blockquote></div><br>