<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:Courier New,courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: Courier New,courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Right.... minimising cost is priority #1... and in this particular case the cheapest route is NOT used.<br><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Andreas Sikkema <h323@ramdyne.nl><br>To: users@lists.openser.org<br>Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:20:08 PM<br>Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] LCR Routing.... Choosing Best Route<br><br>
On Mar 28, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:<br>> However, when you get routes from multiple carriers, they don't <br>> always bill on the same prefix boundaries. In my example above, LCR/ <br>> Carierroute would match against Carrier1 for anything starting with <br>> 1650. HOWEVER, since 165 is also applicable (165 means 1650, 1651 <br>> and so on), and in this example cheaper, you should route 165 over <br>> Carrier 2.<br>><br>> What do people do in this case?<br><br><br>It's called LCR for a reason, so I think minimizing cost should be <br>priority 1. Once price has stopped being the differentiator other <br>factors could be taken into account. Maybe price and other costs have <br>to aggregated?<br><br>-- <br>Andreas Sikkema<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Users mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Users@lists.openser.org"
href="mailto:Users@lists.openser.org">Users@lists.openser.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br></div><br></div></div><br>
<hr size=1>Looking for last minute shopping deals? <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping">
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.</a></body></html>