<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.24.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Dear All, <BR>
<BR>
We have installed Ser on Ubuntu 8.10 and created all MySQL db tables , could someone guide us how to install Serweb and connect it with MySQL in order to add/remove accounts - vendors etc..<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<PRE>
Best Regards,
Ameed Jamous
<FONT COLOR="#ff6600">Business Development Director</FONT>
Tel : +962 6 4602390
Fax : +962 6 4616106
Mob : +962 777 835819
Msn Id : ssw@telejood.com
24/7 Support (Live Chat):http://joodsupport.helpserve.com
<FONT COLOR="#ff6600">URL: www.joodtelecomgroup.com </FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#ff6600">URL: www.joodxchange.com</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#ff6600">URL: www.minutes4real.com</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#ff6600">URL: www.joodvs.com</FONT>
</PRE>
<DIV ALIGN=center><IMG SRC="cid:1225815080.14678.2.camel@Linux-Ubuntu" ALIGN="bottom" BORDER="0"></DIV>
<PRE>
</PRE>
<DIV ALIGN=center><IMG SRC="file:///home/ameed/Documents/image001.jpg" ALIGN="bottom" BORDER="0"></DIV>
<PRE>
</PRE>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 16:46 +0100, Johansson Olle E wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
4 nov 2008 kl. 16.24 skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:<BR>
<BR>
> Hi Olle,<BR>
><BR>
> Thank you for your thoughts. On a first view, it looks interesting, <BR>
> but I'm missing some points here (important points):<BR>
><BR>
> 1) as OpenSER was forked from SER because different views (and the <BR>
> OpenSER view proved to be a very popular and successful one), I <BR>
> wonder why, Kamilio is getting back to SER? not sharing any more the <BR>
> OpenSER view as claimed? because such merging will definitely have a <BR>
> great impact on the dynamical and openness of the projects (like <BR>
> releases, contributions, driving the project)<BR>
><BR>
> 2) this major change of perspective (at least for kamilio) was a <BR>
> backstage decision, kept secret from the community - shouldn't be in <BR>
> the interest of the community to say if going back to the roots <BR>
> (merging into SER) is something wanted or not? it somehow <BR>
> contradicts the self existence of OpenSER, right?<BR>
><BR>
> 3) the benefits you mentions are mainly optimization of the internal <BR>
> project activities and not optimizations of the outcome - what the <BR>
> project will deliver. And I guess this is the most important. We <BR>
> already went though the experience of large devel community, <BR>
> frameworks, etc but with no outcome for more than 2 years...<BR>
><BR>
>> From my personal perspective, the new project looks more like SER <BR>
>> absorbing Kamilio (considering the sizes, the companies behind each<BR>
> project, the resources, and the man-power behind each project).<BR>
><BR>
> And at the moment I would like preserve the OpenSER vision and to <BR>
> have an open source project (a standalone one), far away from the <BR>
> "control" of any Big Brother ;)<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Bogdan,<BR>
Thanks for your feedback, which clearly indicates where you stand <BR>
today. We will have to see what the community says, but so far, I've <BR>
only seen cheers and applauds.<BR>
<BR>
How this will work out in the future is something no one really can <BR>
guess at this point. The more people that joins this effort and forms <BR>
it, the better. The time to make it right is now, by working together <BR>
and aligning the codebases as described, then working towards the <BR>
future with new releases.<BR>
<BR>
We'll see if the combined forces can produce any deliverys or not. <BR>
Today, we can only hope and guess.<BR>
<BR>
I think it's a great starting point that they have started talking, <BR>
and agreed to work together on some parts. To me, it seems to be room <BR>
for two final products stil, sharing the same core. One Kamailio and <BR>
one SER.<BR>
<BR>
After the developer meetings, I think it's time to call for a joint <BR>
community meeting to have people active in the community - not only <BR>
developers - in the same room, discussing benefits of working together.<BR>
<BR>
I don't want to argue your standpoint, just hope that you will follow <BR>
the progress and see if there's some benefits for OpenSIPS to join at <BR>
some stage. Regardless, the GPL license allows you to benefit from the <BR>
work as always.<BR>
<BR>
I might be naive, but I do have a positive feeling about this :-)<BR>
<BR>
/O<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Serusers mailing list<BR>
<A HREF="mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org">Serusers@lists.iptel.org</A><BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers">http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers</A>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>